<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments for Taming the Wild Blue Ether</title> <atom:link href="http://wildblueether.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://wildblueether.com</link> <description>making sense of the Internet and software development</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:13:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>Comment on On the Rails: Set Up Git Repos Locally and On GitHub by Taming the Wild Blue Ether &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On the Rails: Bootstrap a Rackspace Cloud Server</title><link>http://wildblueether.com/2009/12/31/on-the-rails-set-up-git-repos-locally-and-on-github/#comment-18</link> <dc:creator>Taming the Wild Blue Ether &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On the Rails: Bootstrap a Rackspace Cloud Server</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:13:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildblueether.com/?p=253#comment-18</guid> <description>[...] besides us can connect in this way. We&#8217;ll achieve this by adding the public key we generated earlier on our Mac to an &#8220;authorized_keys&#8221; file on the remote [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] besides us can connect in this way. We&#8217;ll achieve this by adding the public key we generated earlier on our Mac to an &#8220;authorized_keys&#8221; file on the remote [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Setting Up Rails and PostgreSQL on Snow Leopard by Taming the Wild Blue Ether &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On the Rails: Create a Simple CRUD App, Set Up Database</title><link>http://wildblueether.com/2009/12/15/setting-up-rails-and-postgresql-on-snow-leopard/#comment-17</link> <dc:creator>Taming the Wild Blue Ether &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On the Rails: Create a Simple CRUD App, Set Up Database</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 06:41:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildblueether.com/?p=183#comment-17</guid> <description>[...] you have everything installed, it&#8217;s actually pretty easy to create a basic application in Rails that can perform the four [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you have everything installed, it&#8217;s actually pretty easy to create a basic application in Rails that can perform the four [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Did Apple &quot;Push&quot; Safari 4 Out to Millions of Users? Not Really. by Jeremy Merrill</title><link>http://wildblueether.com/2009/06/13/did-apple-push-safari-4-out-to-millions-of-users-not-really/#comment-16</link> <dc:creator>Jeremy Merrill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:24:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildblueether.com/?p=137#comment-16</guid> <description>Mick and B: Thank you for reading and commenting on my post!  Mick, I agree that Apple is not innocent.  Certainly they are taking the downloads figure and running with it.  It should be pointed out, as you have, that the update process is responsible for many of the downloads.  Where I take issue with Strohmeyer and Thurrott is the notion of the figure being &quot;pure hype&quot; and having no meaning at all, that everyone was snookered into downloading the product by the update process.  I just don&#039;t think that&#039;s accurate.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mick and B: Thank you for reading and commenting on my post!  Mick, I agree that Apple is not innocent.  Certainly they are taking the downloads figure and running with it.  It should be pointed out, as you have, that the update process is responsible for many of the downloads.  Where I take issue with Strohmeyer and Thurrott is the notion of the figure being &#8220;pure hype&#8221; and having no meaning at all, that everyone was snookered into downloading the product by the update process.  I just don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s accurate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Did Apple &quot;Push&quot; Safari 4 Out to Millions of Users? Not Really. by B.Willey</title><link>http://wildblueether.com/2009/06/13/did-apple-push-safari-4-out-to-millions-of-users-not-really/#comment-15</link> <dc:creator>B.Willey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:08:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildblueether.com/?p=137#comment-15</guid> <description>Well said. There is a significant difference between &quot;push&quot; and &quot;pull.&quot; While the notification that it was available was &quot;pushed&quot; at me (at my choice), when I updated to Safari 4 yesterday, I very clearly &quot;pulled&quot; it down to my PC.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. There is a significant difference between &#8220;push&#8221; and &#8220;pull.&#8221; While the notification that it was available was &#8220;pushed&#8221; at me (at my choice), when I updated to Safari 4 yesterday, I very clearly &#8220;pulled&#8221; it down to my PC.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Did Apple &quot;Push&quot; Safari 4 Out to Millions of Users? Not Really. by Mick</title><link>http://wildblueether.com/2009/06/13/did-apple-push-safari-4-out-to-millions-of-users-not-really/#comment-14</link> <dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:12:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildblueether.com/?p=137#comment-14</guid> <description>Of course Apple will claim the largest number they possibly can, it makes the most sense for a business. But you must also see that the way it is reported is slightly deceiving. The numbers as reported seem to indicate that droves of people have heard of the new version and gone out and downloaded it. While of course this has happened, a lot of people have just received it as part of their normal update procedure.Yes, people could choose not to download it, but chances are many won&#039;t pay attention to what the updater is telling them it is installing, and just confirm it to get back to what they were doing - or they already had a previous version installed that they had tried and thought why not let it update, regardless of whether it will actually be used. This is the muddy waters, since making an announcement about numbers downloaded automatically leads a reader to believe all these people are actually going to *use* the software.Any company that uses a similar tactic should be brought to task as well - this is not an attack against Apple even though they may have a history of this sort of thing - since it is being deceiving and not providing the whole story.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Apple will claim the largest number they possibly can, it makes the most sense for a business. But you must also see that the way it is reported is slightly deceiving. The numbers as reported seem to indicate that droves of people have heard of the new version and gone out and downloaded it. While of course this has happened, a lot of people have just received it as part of their normal update procedure.</p><p>Yes, people could choose not to download it, but chances are many won&#8217;t pay attention to what the updater is telling them it is installing, and just confirm it to get back to what they were doing &#8211; or they already had a previous version installed that they had tried and thought why not let it update, regardless of whether it will actually be used. This is the muddy waters, since making an announcement about numbers downloaded automatically leads a reader to believe all these people are actually going to *use* the software.</p><p>Any company that uses a similar tactic should be brought to task as well &#8211; this is not an attack against Apple even though they may have a history of this sort of thing &#8211; since it is being deceiving and not providing the whole story.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Is &quot;Cloud Computing&quot; what Sun meant&#8230; by Taming the Wild Blue Ether &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cloud Computing != Grid Computing?</title><link>http://wildblueether.com/2008/11/06/is-cloud-computing-what-sun-meant/#comment-13</link> <dc:creator>Taming the Wild Blue Ether &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cloud Computing != Grid Computing?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:08:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildblueether.com/?p=39#comment-13</guid> <description>[...] up to a previous post, I came across a July 2008 article by Thorsten von Eicken, CTO of RightScale, which provides a [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up to a previous post, I came across a July 2008 article by Thorsten von Eicken, CTO of RightScale, which provides a [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: wildblueether.com @ 2012-05-21 00:44:07 -->
